Implications of Genetic Polymorphisms in Inflammation-Induced Atherosclerosis

Jayashree Shanker1, *, Vijay V Kakkar1, 2
1 Thrombosis Research Institute, India
2 Thrombosis Research Institute, London, UK

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1213
Abstract HTML Views: 619
PDF Downloads: 223
Total Views/Downloads: 2055
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 439
Abstract HTML Views: 318
PDF Downloads: 145
Total Views/Downloads: 902

© Shanker and Kakkar; Licensee

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Thrombosis Research Institute India, 256/A, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore 560099, India; Tel: 91-80-27835303; Fax: 91-80-27835302; E-mail:


Inflammation is the mainstay of atherosclerosis and is an important governing factor at all stages of the disease process from lesion formation to plaque build-up and final end-stage rupture and thrombosis. An overview of the numerous clinico-epidemiological studies on the association between inflammatory gene polymorphisms and Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its co-morbidities have shown that the risk associated with any single genotype is modest while the haplotypes, especially those defined on the basis of tag-SNP approach, have better coverage of the gene and show moderately higher impact on disease risk. Nevertheless, even these associations have been inconsistent with low cross-race repeatability. This has been attributed to many plausible causes such as clinical heterogeneity, sample selection criteria, variable genetic landscapes across different ethnic groups, confounding effect of co-morbidities etc. On the other hand, unbiased studies such as the family-based linkage and case-control based associations that have taken into account, thousands of genotypic markers spanning the whole genome, have had the ability to identify novel genetic loci for coronary artery disease. These studies have shown that many inflammatory genes are involved in the regulation of specific biomarkers of inflammation that collectively contribute to the disease-associated risk. In addition, there appears to be considerable cross talk between the different biochemical and metabolic processes. Therefore, consideration of all these factors can build towards an ‘atherosclerotic bionetwork’ that can refine our quest for developing a robust risk stratification tool for cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: Inflammation, Biomarkers, Genes, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, Atherosclerosis..


Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the atherosclerotic disease process and is considered to be a primary modulator of disease risk [1]. Inflammatory cells present in the arterial lesions mediate the various processes of plaque formation, progression and vessel thrombosis. Plasma levels of several inflammatory biomarkers are associated with future cardiovascular risk in a variety of clinical settings. Sustained low-grade inflammatory process can be implicated in enhanced atherothrombosis in certain ethnic groups such as the South Asian, Afro-Caribbean and Hispanic and can influence the efficiency of cardiovascular drug treatments (statins as well as aspirin) [2,3]. The seminal role of inflammation in atherosclerosis dates back to more than 70 years and predates the cholesterol hypothesis. The inflammatory perspective gained preeminence in 1999 with the claim that atherosclerosis is primarily an inflammatory disease [1]. Proof of concept for this hypothesis was initially provided by Ridker and colleagues who showed that despite elevated baseline levels of various upstream markers of inflammation and immune response in CAD patients, high sensitive C Reactive Protein (hsCRP) stood out as the best predictor of disease risk. In their study, healthy men who developed a new cardiovascular event during 8-year follow-up showed baseline CRP levels in the top quartile and were three times at higher risk of developing future Myocardial Infarction (MI) and twice at risk for ischemic stroke as compared to men in the bottom quartile [4]. In 2000, the same group showed a similar trend in a 3-year prospective study on post-menopausal women [5]. Over twenty or more large-scale prospective studies have subsequently shown that the relative impact of hsCRP is at least as large as that individually of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, or smoking. Knowledge of hsCRP was able to correctly reclassify a substantial proportion of "intermediate-risk" individuals into clinically relevant higher- or lower-risk categories in these studies [6]. Risk-prediction models that incorporate hsCRP, such as the Reynolds Risk Score, have improved risk classification and accuracy for global risk prediction, particularly for those deemed at "intermediate risk" by usual algorithms, such as the Framingham Risk Score [7]. Statins, which are primarily advocated as lipid-lowering drug, have been also credited with anti-inflammatory properties [8]. However, clinical trials that are into investigating the long-term benefits of statins such as the JUPITER [9] and PROSPER [10] have shown discrepant findings on the additional value of CRP as a risk predictor in comparison to the prevailing conventional predictors of risk. The outcome of clinical trials is governed by many factors amongst which the design of the trial is a key consideration. Results from other ongoing clinical trials on the efficacy of statin in targeting lipids, inflammation and overall reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk can bring about better clarity in this matter. A comprehensive overview on the pivotal role of inflammation and its downstream reaction sequale in atherosclerosis from the formation of fatty streak and progression to complex plaque and finally plaque rupture that involves various triggers of the inflammatory process has been lucidly described [11,12].

Interleukin 6 (IL6) is an important pleiotropic cytokine that has a broad range of humoral and cellular immune properties relating to inflammation, host defense and tissue injury [13] and contributes to the clinical evolution of CVD. IL6 is the principle mediator of acute-phase response and primary determinant of CRP production by the liver [14]. Although high levels of IL6 have been implicated with future risk of MI event [5,15,16], presence of high correlation between IL6 and CRP levels undermines the independent value of IL6 in many instances. Additionally, CRP has a inherent stable nature, lacks diurnal variation and is easy to assay and hence scores over many other biomarkers of inflammation as the most valuable predictor of CVD risk [17] and as a useful adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of CVD [18].

Some of the other common pro inflammatory cytokines include the Tumor necrosis factor 1 (TNFα) produced by the activated macrophages and the Interleukin1 (IL1) released by the macrophages, platelets and injured endothelium. These cytokines act through the recruitment of monocytes / macrophages to the vessel wall thus eliciting increased expression of adhesion molecules such as Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 (MCP-1) and synthesis of prothrombotic factors such as Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI1) and von Willebrand factor, that promotes plaque vulnerability and ensuing thrombotic events etc.

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the possible associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in inflammatory genes implicated in atherosclerosis. While there are multiple genes that regulate the inflammatory process, we have chosen to elaborate on three key genes in the central inflammatory pathway with emphasis on large studies, primarily to highlight the reported pattern of geno-type-disease association as well as to understand the genetic and environmental factors that influence these outcome such that appropriate study design and methodology may be adopted that adequately address the prevailing lacunae and help in the planning of robust research strategies in future.


Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes relating to inflammation have been linked to enhanced risk of CVD but the risk associated with any one genotype has been considered to be modest. Taking into consideration, the high allele frequency for many of the variants in the constitution of haplotypes, multiple ‘risk alleles’ may have a larger impact on the regulation of gene activity and function [19] as well as in the modulation of clinically significant risk [20]. A number of studies have reported the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes of inflammation with plasma biomarker, CVD and its co-morbidities. An overview on the genotype-phenotype associations of three of the well-studied inflammatory genes that belong to the central inflammatory process are provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Overview of Genotype-Phenotype Association of some key Inflammatory Genes Variants

Genes SNP rsID Vascular Events Surrogate Biomarkers
IL6 -174G>C rs1800795 CAD/MI [22, 26, 27] High plasma IL6 levels [24]
CIMT [32] High CRP levels [22, 52, 53, 55]
PAD [33] High Systolic Blood pressure [27]
Increased arterial stiffness[28]
Insulin insensitivity [84]
Lipid abnormalities [34]
-572G>C rs1800796 CAD / MI [38] High plasma IL6 levels [24]
Plasma IL6, CRP, Fibrinogen [54]
CRP +1444C>T rs3091244 CAD [46] High plasma CRP levels [42, 45, 52, 85, 86]
Stroke [87] Hypertension [47]
Obesity [50]
rs3093058 High Plasma CRP levels [86]
rs3091244 High Plasma CRP levels [49]
rs1800947 Arterial pulse-wave velocity [49]
TNF-α -308G>A rs3091256 CAD [58, 60, 61, 66, 67]
Obesity [63]
Insulin resistance [64]
Metabolic syndrome [62]
Plasma CRP levels [65]

CAD – Coronary Artery Disease, CIMT – Carotid Intima Media Thickness, CRP- C-reactive protein, IL 6 – Interleukin 6, MI- Myocardial Infarction, PAD – Peripheral Arterial Disease, SNP – Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, TNF- α – Tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Note: References given in brackets.

IL6 Gene Polymorphisms

Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the IL6 regulate the expression and inter individual variability of plasma IL 6 in a complex, interactive and haplotype-dependent manner [19]. Five common promoter SNPs in the IL6 gene have been shown to be in strong equilibrium with each other using pair-wise Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) analysis [21]. Independently and in combination, these promoter SNPs has been associated with various pathological states of CVD and its co-morbidities. In a recent report on a predisposed cohort of Asian Indians, a risk haplotype, GGAAG, defined by these promoter SNPs was shown to be associated with over 3.7 times risk of CAD (OR 3.676, 95% CI 1.68 – 8.05, P = 0.0017) and a population attributable risk of 21.1% [22].

The –174G>C variant (rsID1800795) has been the most widely studied promoter SNP and both the G and the C alleles have been independently associated with CVD and its co-morbidities. The C allele was associated with higher basal plasma IL6 levels [23,24] and showed over 1.34 times risk of MI in the ECTIM study on 640 patients and 719 controls [25]. Levels of IL6 were shown to reach their peak, 6 hours following bypass surgery, particularly among C allele carriers [24]. Among the WOSCOPS cohort, comprising of 498 MI patients who were followed up for 4.8 year, response to Pravastatin was better among individuals with CC genotype who also exhibited a significant lowered risk of CHD as compared to the placebo treatment group (OR 0.46, 95% CI-0.27-0.79, P=0.019) [26]. The C allele has also been significantly associated with the following disease states - higher systolic BP in men with BMI >24.86 kg/m2; higher risk of CHD among smokers [27]; increased arterial stiffness in the Rotterdam study [28] and elevated HSP60 levels in the KORA 2000 study [29].

On the other hand, the G allele has been associated with increased cerebrovascular events and severe disability post event in the Rotterdam study [30], increased secretion of IL6 and reduced insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic subjects, increased correlation between adipose IL6 mRNA expression and insulin resistance in morbidly obese individuals [31], increased Intima-Media Thickness ( IMT) in middle-aged men without exercise induced ischemia [32], risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in Ty2DM patients [33] and abnormalities in lipid metabolism [34].

In contrast to the above findings, the large MONICA survey on Bavarian residents have shown no association of the –174G>C SNP with any of the traditional risk factors nor prevalence of MI [35], while the Turkish case-control report on a small cohort of 120 CAD patients and 105 controls showed that this polymorphisms does not contribute to the risk stratification [36]. In one of the largest report to date on 2691 Ty2DM patients and 2238 controls from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health professional follow-up study, no association was shown between diabetes and any of the five IL6 promoter SNPs, which was additionally verified by comprehensive meta analysis ([21]. Genotype-phenotype studies on Ischemic stroke patients exhibited a similar variability in the pattern of association of either the G or C allele of the –174G>C [37] with stroke.

With regard to the other promoter variants in the IL6 gene, the G allele of the –572 G>C SNP was associated with MI in a Han Chinese population [38], with a RR of 1.652 for CHD in another Chinese study [39] and with plasma IL6, CRP and fibrinogen in CAD patients in a Korean study [40]. Ex vivo stimulation of leukocytes by LPS showed elevated baseline levels of IL6 among carriers of the G allele in a study involving both –597G>A (rs1800797) and –174G>A SNPs [41].

The underlying reasons for these inconsistencies in study findings are manifold. Primarily, IL6 has a complex physiology with both pro-and anti-inflammatory properties and complex pattern of transcriptional regulation. Presence of clinical heterogeneity, lack of stringent phenotype definition of cases and controls and presence of co-morbidities hinder the identity of true causal verses casual effects. Other plausible issues relating to genetic factors such as Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), allele frequencies, influence of neighboring genetic variants and time of sample collection can also influence the outcome of the study findings.

CRP Gene Polymorphisms

Baseline CRP level is influenced by genetic, environmental and clinical factors [42]. CRP shows a heritability of 27%- 40%, indicating considerable influence of genetic regulation on this trait [43,44]. In an in-depth analysis of over thirteen lead SNPs selected using the tag-SNP approach in 3301 participants from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS), Kathiresan S et al. identified one triallelic SNP +1444C>T>A (rsID3091244) in the promoter region that was significantly associated with high CRP levels (p<0.0001). However, this SNP was able to independently account for only 1.4% of the variation in CRP levels while twelve of the clinical correlates explained up to 26% of the variability, BMI being prominent among them [45]. In yet another large investigation of over 7159 subjects from the Third NHANES cohort comprising of mixed ethnic groups, two SNPs, rs3093058 and rs3091244 were associated with high CRP levels and two SNPs, rs1205 and rs2808630 with low CRP levels. After adjusting for covariates and post-hoc analysis, only rs3091244 SNP was associated with prevalent CAD, particularly in the non-Hispanic White population [46]. In a more recent analysis of data pooled from 5 different studies comprising of 4610 CAD patients and over 14,000 non-CAD subjects, it was observed that although the rs3091244 variant was significantly associated with high CRP levels, there was no association with risk of CHD, particularly after adjusting for confounders. This SNP along with other variants have been associated with CRP levels and hypertension in the Turkish study [47], with Ischemic stroke in a Chinese study [48], with arterial pulse-wave velocity in a Japanese cohort [49] and with obesity in a Taiwanese cohort [50]. However, in the Segovia study on a Spanish population, although four SNPs (rs1417938, rs1800947, rs1130864, rs1205) were significantly associated with CRP levels after adjusting for clinical variables and was able to explain up to 2.9% of the total variability in CRP levels, interestingly, this did not include the better known rs3091244 SNP [51]. Regulation of plasma CRP levels has been additionally associated with promoter polymorphisms in the IL6 gene in various studies [52-54]. A genome-wide association study was performed in 6345 healthy women employing 336,108 SNPs, considered as potential determinants of plasma CRP in the Women’s Genome Health Study. This study identified seven novel gene loci, including the HNF-1 (hepatic nuclear factor 1alpha) and GCKR, belonging to various inflammatory and metabolic pathways that showed significant genome wide association with CRP levels [55]. In a comprehensive two-stage analysis of a large combined cohort from the PARC and the CHS study population, one SNP, rs7953249, in the HNF-1 A gene was significantly associated with plasma CRP levels after adjusting for all potential clinical covariates and rigorous statistical analysis [56]. A 17A repeat allele variant in the FLAP gene has been associated with high CRP levels in CAD patients in a Taiwanese study [57]. Thus, the paradoxical findings on the association of CRP gene polymorphisms with CVD paint a similar picture to that of the IL6, wherein complex regulatory mechanisms, confounding interactions with conventional risk factors, variable genetic landscape of the geographic population under study and presence/absence of HWE that have not been adequately addressed in some of these studies, could possibly explain the vagaries in the study findings.

TNF-α Gene Polymorphisms

The tumor necrosis factor is yet another important cytokine that participates in the inflammatory reaction and has been attributed with modulation of CVD risk. Polymorphisms in the TNF-α and its receptor genes (TNFR1&TNFR2) and the gene for TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TACE or ADAM17), that mainly controls the rate of its shedding from cell surface, have been investigated in the various studies. The –308 G>A (rs3091256) promoter variant has received the most attention and has shown contradictory associations in the development of CAD [58-60] in a population specific manner. Others have reported association with CAD in the presence of specific co-morbidities such as obesity, high systolic BP and plasma insulin levels [61] as well as the metabolic syndrome phenotype [62]. The A allele has also been independently associated with obesity in a Spanish study [63], insulin resistance in obese subjects in an Australian study [64] and plasma CRP levels in the HERITAGE study [65]. Variations in the ADAM17 gene have been shown to be marginally associated with high plasma TNF- α levels as well as risk of cardiovascular death in a prospective cohort of 1400 individuals enrolled in the ATHEROGENE study [66]. Analysis of the TNF superfamily 4 (TNFSF4) gene variation showed limited association of these variants with CVD in Women in a prospective, all-white, WHS cohort comprising of 344 incident CVD cases and 2254 control participants who were followed up for10 years [67,68].

With regard to some of the other pro-inflammatory cytokine genes, the Interleukin-1 (IL1) gene cluster and the IL18 and its receptor (IL18R1 & IL18RAP-receptor accessory protein) have been investigated in a few studies. While there is no debate that their levels may be elevated in patients with CAD who exhibit a strong inflammatory response, the direct association of genetic variants within these genes with CVD has been largely negative [69,70] except in limited studies [71]. Baseline levels of IL-18 were higher among healthy women in a nested case-control study who subsequently developed CVD. The RR for future CVD event was 2.53 among individuals in the highest quartile of IL-18 levels as compared to those in the lowest quartile. While that risk was attenuated after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, those with IL-18 levels at or above the 90th percentile threshold remained at elevated risk even after adjustment [72]. Similarly, while IL10 has been known to exert an anti-inflammatory effect and lowered risk of coronary events in patients with unstable angina [73,74], no direct association has been reported with the IL0 polymorphisms in the modulation of CAD risk.

Family-based linkage studies and genome-wide association studies have gained immense popularity and attention in the last decade. Such studies involving a consortium of multiple reputed institutions have a combined power of efficient, high-throughput technologies backed by ample financial resources to scan over 100 K – 1 million variants spanning across the entire genome in an unbiased manner, and have been able to identify interesting and novel loci associated with CAD [75-78]. Studies that have involved a restricted clinical phenotype such as MI have had better success than others that have investigated an ‘all-inclusive CAD phenotype’, which may represent gradient as well as overlapping clinical presentations with inadequate distinction between them. Linkage studies on biomarkers of vascular inflammation, namely CRP, IL6, MCP-1, sICAM in the Framingham Heart Study has shown that multiple genes such as SELE, SELP and CRP on chromosome 1 that influence their levels and may have a potential role in the development of CVD [43]. Analysis involving quantitative trait loci (QTL), as in the Quebec family study, has identified novel loci for CRP on 12p11.23 (P = 0.001) and 12q15 (P = 0.0005) and for IL-6 on 14q12 (P = 0.002). However, none of these loci remained significant after adjusting for BMI [79]. In the HERITAGE family study, strong evidence of linkage was observed on chromosome 20q13 and suggestive evidence on several other chromosomal loci implicating multiple loci for regulating inflammatory response [80]. Genome wide scan with microsatellite markers in hypertensive subjects have identified QTL for CRP on chromosome 10q22 and 21 [81]. While ‘stand-alone’ association studies do contribute to the general knowledge-pool, such high-powered, hypothesis-free association studies have the strength in sample size as well as sophisticated statistical methods that can adjust for the effect of multiple confounding factors and can therefore add tremendous value towards delineating of the molecular basis of CVD.

An overview on these findings carried out mainly in Caucasian populations, however reveal that there is limited cross-race repeatability. While clinical heterogeneity, variable pathological settings arising out of confounding co-morbidities and ethnicity have been some of the key issues on one hand, technical matters such as SNP selection based on the Hapmap data that has limited SNP coverage, have added to the differences in study findings.

It is worthwhile to ponder that various implicated putative CAD loci that have attained genome wide significance have been linked to both cholesterol metabolism (PCSK9, LDLR, LPA) [76,78,82] and to inflammation (HNF-1, CXCL12) [75,76]. Clinical studies have shown that while lipid levels relate to plaque build-up in the artery, inflammatory response preempts plaque instability, rupture and thrombosis. However, both lipid metabolism and inflammation are complex, independent yet interdependent processes that can modulate CVD risk in a clinical setting. While the various statin trials on one hand suggests this link, the experimental observations published by Kleeman et al. in 2007 serve as a true litmus test to this ongoing relationship between lipids and inflammation [83]. Through application of systems biology tools of transcriptomics and metabolomics, the authors have shown that based on the level of cholesterol diet intake in the ApoE Leiden transgenic mice, the liver switches from a resilient ‘low cholesterol stress state’ to a predominantly ‘inflammatory state’ and this intricate switching is controlled by common transcriptional regulators, thereby providing a rationale for an interrelationship between the two processes.


From the various genetic studies discussed above, it appears that consideration towards a study design that adequately addresses issues such as sample size, sample composition based on stringent clinical criteria, allelic frequencies, HWE, LD distribution and mode of inheritance would be critical factors that can govern the successful outcome of the study. In addition, the future course of design for improved risk stratification should bear in mind the presence of a multiple loci /genes that include overlapping atherothrombotic pathways, which act in tandem to modulate the inflammatory milieu of the individual against the background of well-established risk factors (Fig. 1). Sensitive proteomic platforms such as the bead-based arrays facilitate the simultaneous detection of multiple, low abundant proteins in circulation which when combined with the genetic profile generated from ‘chip-based’ gene arrays, can define an ‘atherosclerotic bionetwork’ that can refine our quest towards development of a robust risk stratification tool for cardiovascular disease.

Fig. (1).

Schematic model incorporating various atherothrombotic risk factors and associated genes for enhanced cardiovascular risk prediction


BMI Body mass index
CAD Coronary artery disease
CHS Cardiovascular health study CVD – Cardiovascular disease
CRP C Reactive Protein
CVD Cardiovascular Disease
CXCL12 Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 12
ECTIM study Etude Case-Temoin de l'Infarctus du Myocarde
FHS Framingham Heart Study
FLAP 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein
HNF-1 Hepatic nuclear factor 1 alpha
IL 1 Interleukin1
IL6 Interleukin 6
IL 10 Interleukin 10IL 18 – Interleukin 18
IMT Intima-media thickness
JUPITER Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention
LD Linkage Disequilibrium
LDLR Low-density lipoprotein receptor
LP (a) Lipoprotein
MCP-1 Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1
MI Myocardial infarction
MONICA study Multinational monitoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease
NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
OR Odds Ratio
PARC Pharmacogenomics and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
PCSK9 Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
PROSPER Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk
PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1
RR Relative Risk
SELE Selectin E endothelial Adhesion Molecule 1
SELP Selectin P granule membrane protein 140kDa, antigen CD62
SNPs Single nucleotide polymorphisms
sICAM Soluble intracellular adhesion molecule
TNFα Tumor necrosis factor 1
TNFSF4 TNF superfamily 4
TACE TNF-alpha converting enzyme
WGHS Women’s genome health study
WOSCOPS West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study


We thank the trustees of Thrombosis Research Institutes in Bangalore, India and London, UK for their constant support and encouragement. We gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Tata Social Welfare Trust and the Department of Biotechnology from India as well as the Weston Foundation and the Emmanuel Kaye Foundation in UK to the Thrombosis Research Institute India and its numerous research studies.


[1] Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 115-26.
[2] Gasparyan AY, Watson T, Lip GY. The role of aspirin in cardiovascular prevention: implications of aspirin resistance J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1829-43.
[3] Kanjilal S, Shanker J, Rao VS, et al. Prevalence and component analysis of metabolic syndrome: an Indian atherosclerosis research study perspective Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4: 189-97.
[4] Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 973-.
[5] Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 836-43.
[6] Ridker PM. C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2129-38.
[7] Ridker PM, Silvertown JD. Inflammation, C-reactive protein, and atherothrombosis J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1544-51.
[8] Albert MA, Danielson E, Rifai N, Ridker PM. Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: the pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): a randomized trial and cohort study JAMA 2001; 286: 64-70.
[9] Mora S, Musunuru K, Blumenthal RS. The clinical utility of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in cardiovascular disease and the potential implication of JUPITER on current practice guidelines Clin Chem 2009; 55: 219-8.
[10] Sattar N, Murray HM, McConnachie A, et al. C-reactive protein and prediction of coronary heart disease and global vascular events in the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) Circulation 2007; 115: 981-.
[11] Libby P. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease mechanisms Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 456S-60S.
[12] Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis Circulation 2002; 105: 1135-43.
[13] Papanicolaou DA, Wilder RL, Manolagas SC, Chrousos GP. The pathophysiologic roles of interleukin-6 in human disease Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 127-37.
[14] Heinrich PC, Castell JV, Andus T. Interleukin-6 and the acute phase response Biochem J 1990; 265: 621-36.
[15] Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Colizzi C, Maseri A. The role of cytokines in unstable angina Expert Opin Investig Drugs 1998; 7: 1667-72.
[16] Miyao Y, Yasue H, Ogawa H, et al. Elevated plasma interleukin-6 levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1299-304.
[17] Meier-Ewert HK, Ridker PM, Rifai N, Price N, Dinges DF, Mullington JM. Absence of diurnal variation of C-reactive protein concentrations in healthy human subjects Clin Chem 2001; 47: 426-30.
[18] Ridker PM. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: potential adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease Circulation 2001; 103: 1813-8.
[19] Terry CF, Loukaci V, Green FR. Cooperative influence of genetic polymorphisms on interleukin 6 transcriptional regulation J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 18138-44.
[20] Humphries SE, Yiannakouris N, Talmud PJ. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using genetic information (gene scores): is it really informative? Curr Opin Lipidol 2008; 19: 128-32.
[21] Qi L, van Dam RM, Meigs JB, Manson JE, Hunter D, Hu FB. Genetic variation in IL6 gene and type 2 diabetes: tagging-SNP haplotype analysis in large-scale case-control study and meta-analysis Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15: 1914-20.
[22] Maitra A, Shanker J, Dash D, et al. Polymorphisms in the IL6 gene in Asian Indian families with premature coronary artery disease--the Indian Atherosclerosis Research Study Thromb Haemost 2008; 99: 944-50.
[23] Bittar MN, Carey JA, Barnard J, et al. Interleukin 6 G-174C polymorphism influences outcome following coronary revascularization surgery Heart Surg Forum 2005; 8: E140-5, discussion E145.
[24] Brull DJ, Montgomery HE, Sanders J, et al. Interleukin-6 gene -174g>c and -572g>c promoter polymorphisms are strong predictors of plasma interleukin-6 levels after coronary artery bypass surgery Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21: 1458-63.
[25] Georges JL, Loukaci V, Poirier O, et al. Interleukin-6 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to myocardial infarction: the ECTIM study.Etude Cas-Temoin de l'Infarctus du Myocarde J Mol Med 2001; 79: 300-5.
[26] Basso F, Lowe GD, Rumley A, McMahon AD, Humphries SE. Interleukin-6 -174G>C polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease in West of Scotland coronary prevention study (WOSCOPS) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22: 599-604.
[27] Humphries SE, Luong LA, Ogg MS, Hawe E, Miller GJ. The interleukin-6 -174 G/C promoter polymorphism is associated with risk of coronary heart disease and systolic blood pressure in healthy men Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 2243-52.
[28] Sie MP, Mattace-Raso FU, Uitterlinden AG, et al. The interleukin-6-174 G/C promoter polymorphism and arterial stiffness, the Rotterdam Study Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008; 4: 863-9.
[29] Mostafazadeh A, Herder C, Haastert B, et al. Association of humoral immunity to human Hsp60 with the IL-6 gene polymorphism C-174G in patients with type 2 diabetes and controls Horm Metab Res 2005; 37: 257-63.
[30] Greisenegger S, Zehetmayer S, Bauer P, et al. Polymorphisms in inflammatory genes and the risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: results of a multilocus genotyping assay Clin Chem 2009; 55: 134-8.
[31] Pickup JC. Inflammation and activated innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 813-23.
[32] Rauramaa R, Vaisanen SB, Luong LA, et al. Stromelysin-1 and interleukin-6 gene promoter polymorphisms are determinants of asymptomatic carotid artery atherosclerosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20: 2657-62.
[33] Libra M, Signorelli SS, Bevelacqua Y, et al. Analysis of G(-174)C IL-6 polymorphism and plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and peripheral arterial disease J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 211-5.
[34] Fernandez-Real JM, Broch M, Vendrell J, Richart C, Ricart W. Interleukin-6 gene polymorphism and lipid abnormalities in healthy subjects J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 1334-9.
[35] Lieb W, Pavlik R, Erdmann J, et al. No association of interleukin-6 gene polymorphism (-174 G/C) with myocardial infarction or traditional cardiovascular risk factors Int J Cardiol 2004; 97: 205-12.
[36] Sekuri C, Cam FS, Sagcan A, et al. No association of interleukin-6 gene polymorphism (-174 G/C) with premature coronary artery disease in a Turkish cohort Coronary Artery Dis 2007; 18: 333-7.
[37] Tso AR, Merino JG, Warach S. Interleukin-6 174G/C polymorphism and ischemic stroke: a systematic review Stroke 2007; 38: 3070-5.
[38] Fu HX, Zhang JY, Li GS, Li Y, Xu JL, Zhao ZN. Study on linkage between polymorphism of interleukin 6 gene -572C/G and susceptibility to myocardial infarction Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 2006; 23: 245-9.
[39] Wei YS, Lan Y, Liu YG, Tang RG, Lan JS. Relationship between interleukin-6 gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease and its effect on plasma lipid levels Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2006; 18: 233-6.
[40] Jang Y, Kim OY, Hyun YJ, et al. Interleukin-6-572C>G polymorphism-association with inflammatory variables in Korean men with coronary artery disease Transl Res 2008; 151: 154-61.
[41] Rivera-Chavez FA, Peters-Hybki DL, Barber RC, O'Keefe GE. Interleukin-6 promoter haplotypes and interleukin-6 cytokine responses Shock 2003; 20: 218-3.
[42] Carlson CS, Aldred SF, Lee PK, et al. Polymorphisms within the C-reactive protein (CRP) promoter region are associated with plasma CRP levels Am J Hum Genet 2005; 77: 64-77.
[43] Dupuis J, Larson MG, Vasan RS, et al. Genome scan of systemic biomarkers of vascular inflammation in the Framingham Heart Study: evidence for susceptibility loci on 1q Atherosclerosis 2005; 182: 307-14.
[44] Pankow JS, Folsom AR, Cushman M, et al. Familial and genetic determinants of systemic markers of inflammation: the NHLBI family heart study Atherosclerosis 2001; 154: 681-9.
[45] Kathiresan S, Larson MG, Vasan RS, et al. Contribution of clinical correlates and 13 C-reactive protein gene polymorphisms to interindividual variability in serum C-reactive protein level Circulation 2006; 113: 1415-23.
[46] Crawford DC, Sanders CL, Qin X, et al. Genetic variation is associated with C-reactive protein levels in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Circulation 2006; 114: 2458-65.
[47] Evrim KB, Nihan EU, Altan O, et al. Association of C-reactive protein (CRP) gene allelic variants with serum CRP levels and hypertension in Turkish adults Atherosclerosis 2009; 206(2 ): 474-9.
[48] Wang Q, Ding H, Tang JR, et al. C-reactive protein polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility to ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke in the Chinese Han population Acta Pharmacol Sin 2009; 30: 291-8.
[49] Morita A, Nakayama T, Doba N, Hinohara S, Soma M. Polymorphism of the C-reactive protein (CRP) gene is related to serum CRP Level and arterial pulse wave velocity in healthy elderly Japanese Hypertens Res 2006; 29: 323-1.
[50] Teng MS, Hsu LA, Wu S, Chang HH, Chou HH, Ko YL. Association between C-reactive protein gene haplotypes and C-reactive protein levels in Taiwanese: interaction with obesity Atherosclerosis 2009; 204: e64-9.
[51] Martinez-Calatrava MJ, Gonzalez-Sanchez JL, Martinez-Larrad MT, Perez-Barba M, Serrano-Rios M. Common haplotypes of the C-reactive protein gene and circulating leptin levels influence the interindividual variability in serum C-reactive protein levels The Segovia study Thromb Haemost 2007; 98: 1088-95.
[52] Paik JK, Kim OY, Koh SJ, et al. Additive effect of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) single nucleotide polymorphism on serum CRP concentration and other cardiovascular risk factors Clin Chim Acta 2007; 380: 68-74.
[53] Vickers MA, Green FR, Terry C, et al. Genotype at a promoter polymorphism of the interleukin-6 gene is associated with baseline levels of plasma C-reactive protein Cardiovasc Res 2002; 53: 1029-34.
[54] Wong LY, Leung RY, Ong KL, Cheung BM. Plasma levels of fibrinogen and C-reactive protein are related to interleukin-6 gene -572C>G polymorphism in subjects with and without hypertension J Hum Hypertens 2007; 21: 875-2.
[55] Ridker PM, Pare G, Parker A, et al. Loci related to metabolic-syndrome pathways including LEPR,HNF1A, IL6R, and GCKR associate with plasma C-reactive protein: the Women's Genome Health Study Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82: 1185-92.
[56] Reiner AP, Barber MJ, Guan Y, et al. Polymorphisms of the HNF1A gene encoding hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 alpha are associated with C-reactive protein Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82: 1193-201.
[57] Jeng JR. Plasma C-reactive protein and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein gene promoter poly-A polymorphism in patients with coronary artery disease Cardiology 2008; 109: 25-32.
[58] Allen RA, Lee EM, Roberts DH, Park BK, Pirmohamed M. Polymorphisms in the TNF-alpha and TNF-receptor genes in patients with coronary artery disease Eur J Clin Invest 2001; 31: 843-51.
[59] Koch W, Kastrati A, Bottiger C, Mehilli J, von Beckerath N, Schomig A. Interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor gene polymorphisms and risk of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction Atherosclerosis 2001; 159: 137-44.
[60] Pereira TV, Rudnicki M, Franco RF, Pereira AC, Krieger JE. Effect of the G-308A polymorphism of the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene on the risk of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis Am Heart J 2007; 153: 821-30.
[61] Sbarsi I, Falcone C, Boiocchi C, et al. Inflammation and atherosclerosis: the role of TNF and TNF receptors polymorphisms in coronary artery disease Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2007; 20: 145-54.
[62] Sookoian SC, Gonzalez C, Pirola CJ. Meta-analysis on the G-308A tumor necrosis factor alpha gene variant and phenotypes associated with the metabolic syndrome Obes Res 2005; 13: 2122-31.
[63] Corbalan MS, Marti A, Forga L, Patino A, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA. Influence of two polymorphisms of the tumoral necrosis factor-alpha gene on the obesity phenotype Diabetes Nutr Metab 2004; 17: 17-22.
[64] Dalziel B, Gosby AK, Richman RM, Bryson JM, Caterson ID. Association of the TNF-alpha -308 G/A promoter polymorphism with insulin resistance in obesity Obes Res 2002; 10: 401-7.
[65] Lakka HM, Lakka TA, Rankinen T, et al. The TNF-alpha G-308A polymorphism is associated with C-reactive protein levels: the HERITAGE Family Study Vasc Pharmacol 2006; 44: 377-83.
[66] Morange PE, Tregouet DA, Godefroy T, et al. Polymorphisms of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) and the TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TACE/ADAM17) genes in relation to cardiovascular mortality: the AtheroGene study J Mol Med 2008; 86: 1153-61.
[67] Mälarstig A, Eriksson P, Rose L, et al. Genetic variants of tumor necrosis factor superfamily, member 4 (TNFSF4), and risk of incident atherothrombosis and venous thromboembolism Clin Chem 2008; 54: 833-40.
[68] Zee RY, Hennessey H, Michaud SE, Ridker PM. Genetic variants within the interleukin-1 gene cluster, and risk of incident myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke: a nested case-control approach Atherosclerosis 2008; 201(1): 124-9.
[69] Grisoni ML, Proust C, Alanne M, et al. Lack of association between polymorphisms of the IL18R1 and IL18RAP genes and cardiovascular risk: the MORGAM Project BMC Med Genet 2009; 10: 44-00.
[70] Vohnout B, Di Castelnuovo A, Trotta R, et al. Interleukin-1 gene cluster polymorphisms and risk of coronary artery disease Haematologica 2003; 88: 54-60.
[71] Iacoviello L, Di Castelnuovo A, Gattone M, et al. Polymorphisms of the interleukin-1beta gene affect the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke at young age and the response of mononuclear cells to stimulation in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25: 222-7.
[72] Everett BM, Bansal S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Interleukin-18 and the risk of future cardiovascular disease among initially healthy women Atherosclerosis 2009; 202: 282-8.
[73] Anguera I, Miranda-Guardiola F, Bosch X, et al. Elevation of serum levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 and decreased risk of coronary events in patients with unstable angina Am Heart J 2002; 144: 811-7.
[74] Smith DA, Irving SD, Sheldon J, Cole D, Kaski JC. Serum levels of the antiinflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 are decreased in patients with unstable angina Circulation 2001; 104: 746-9.
[75] Erdmann J, Grosshennig A, Braund PS, et al. New susceptibility locus for coronary artery disease on chromosome 3q22 Nat Genet 2009; 41: 280-.
[76] Kathiresan S, Voight BF, Purcell S, et al. Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants Nat Genet 2009; 41: 334-41.
[77] Samani NJ, Deloukas P, Erdmann J, et al. Large scale association analysis of novel genetic loci for coronary artery disease Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29: 774-80.
[78] Trégouët DA, König IR, Erdmann J, et al. Genome-wide haplotype association study identifies the SLC22A3-LPAL2-LPA gene cluster as a risk locus for coronary artery disease Nat Genet 2009; 41: 283-5.
[79] Ruchat SM, Despres JP, Weisnagel SJ, Chagnon YC, Bouchard C, Perusse L. Genome-wide linkage analysis for circulating levels of adipokines and C-reactive protein in the Quebec family study (QFS) J Hum Genet 2008; 53: 629-36.
[80] Lakka TA, Rankinen T, Rice T, et al. Quantitative trait locus on chromosome 20q13 for plasma levels of C-reactive protein in healthy whites: the HERITAGE Family Study Physiol Genomics 2006; 27: 103-7.
[81] Ding K, Feng D, de Andrade M, et al. Genomic regions that influence plasma levels of inflammatory markers in hypertensive sibships J Hum Hypertens 2008; 22: 102-.
[82] Samani NJ, Braund PS, Erdmann J, et al. The novel genetic variant predisposing to coronary artery disease in the region of the PSRC1 and CELSR2 genes on chromosome 1 associates with serum cholesterol J Mol Med 2008; 86: 1233-41.
[83] Kleemann R, Verschuren L, van Erk MJ, et al. Atherosclerosis and liver inflammation induced by increased dietary cholesterol intake: a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis Genome Biol 2007; 8: R200-0.
[84] Fernandez-Real JM, Broch M, Vendrell J, et al. Interleukin-6 gene polymorphism and insulin sensitivity Diabetes 2000; 49: 517-20.
[85] Grammer TB, Marz W, Renner W, Bohm BO, Hoffmann MM. C-reactive protein genotypes associated with circulating C-reactive protein but not with angiographic coronary artery disease: the LURIC study Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 170-82.
[86] Wang Q, Hunt SC, Xu Q, et al. Association study of CRP gene polymorphisms with serum CRP level and cardiovascular risk in the NHLBI Family Heart Study Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006; 291: H2752-7.
[87] Andersson J, Johansson L, Ladenvall P, et al. C-reactive protein is a determinant of first-ever stroke: prospective nested case-referent study Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27: 544-1.