Effects of Bileaflet Mechanical Mitral Valve Rotational Orientation on Left Ventricular Flow Conditions

John C Westerdale 1, Ronald Adrian 1, Kyle Squires 1, Hari Chaliki 2, Marek Belohlavek 2, *
1 School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
2 Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 559
Abstract HTML Views: 274
PDF Downloads: 108
Total Views/Downloads: 941
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 166
Abstract HTML Views: 130
PDF Downloads: 71
Total Views/Downloads: 367

© Westerdale et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Translational Ultrasound Research Laboratory, Johnson Research Building 3-361, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA; Tel: 480-301-6694, Fax: 480-301-9162, E-mail: belohlavek.marek@mayo.edu


We studied left ventricular flow patterns for a range of rotational orientations of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve (MHV) implanted in the mitral position of an elastic model of a beating left ventricle (LV). The valve was rotated through 3 angular positions (0, 45, and 90 degrees) about the LV long axis. Ultrasound scans of the elastic LV were obtained in four apical 2-dimensional (2D) imaging projections, each with 45 degrees of separation. Particle imaging velocimetry was performed during the diastolic period to quantify the in-plane velocity field obtained by computer tracking of diluted microbubbles in the acquired ultrasound projections. The resulting velocity field, vorticity, and shear stresses were statistically significantly altered by angular positioning of the mechanical valve, although the results did not show any specific trend with the valve angular position and were highly dependent on the orientation of the imaging plane with respect to the valve. We conclude that bileaflet MHV orientation influences hemodynamics of LV filling. However, determination of ‘optimal’ valve orientation cannot be made without measurement techniques that account for the highly 3-dimensional (3D) intraventricular flow.

Keywords: Diastolic filling, left heart model, left ventricular hemodynamics, mechanical heart valve, particle imaging velocimetry, shear stress, vorticity.