Life-threatening Rupture of a Femoral Pseudoaneurysm after Cardiac Catheterization



Emmanouil Petrou1, *, Ioannis Malakos1, Stamatina Kampanarou2, Nikolaos Doulas3, Vassilis Voudris1
1 Division of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
2 Imaging Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
3 Department of Vascular Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 683
Abstract HTML Views: 584
PDF Downloads: 135
ePub Downloads: 108
Total Views/Downloads: 1510
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 451
Abstract HTML Views: 272
PDF Downloads: 101
ePub Downloads: 86
Total Views/Downloads: 910



© Petrou et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

Correspondence: Address correspondence to this author at the Division of Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 356 Sygrou Ave., GR-17674, Kallithea-Athens, Greece; Tel: +302109493000; Fax: +302102751028; E-mail: emmgpetrou@hotmail.com


Abstract

A pseudoaneurysm refers to a defect in the arterial wall, allowing communication of arterial blood with the adjacent extra-luminal space. Pseudoaneurysms result from traumatic arterial injury. With the increasing utilization of percutaneous arterial interventions, iatrogenic arterial injury has become the predominant cause of pseudoaneurysm formation. Rupture of the pseudoaneurysm comprises a vascular emergency. Clinical suspicion and imaging techniques are the cornerstones of timely diagnosis and appropriate management of the condition. Herein, we report the case of a 69 year-old woman who suffered a life-threatening profunda femoral artery pseudoaneurysm rupture after a routine cardiac catheterization, that was treated surgically.

Keywords: Catheterization, Duplex ultrasonography (DUS), Judkins catheters, Pseudoaneurysm, Therapeutic endovascular interventions.



CASE PRESENTATION

A 69 year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for a preoperative coronary arteriography. The patient was scheduled for aortic and mitral valve replacement due to severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis and mitral insufficiency, respectively. Thirty-two years prior, she underwent mitral valve replacement with a bileaflet mechanical valve for mitral stenosis of rheumatic etiology. On admission, the patient was hemodynamically and clinically stable. She underwent an uneventfull coronary arteriography, via a 6F right femoral sheath and the usage of standard Judkins catheters, which demonstrated normal coronary arteries. The patient was scheduled to be discharged on the next day. However, about 6 hours after sheath removal, the patient experienced severe sharp pain in the right anterior femoral region, without reported numbness, tingling, or loss of voluntary movement. Physical examination revealed severe hypotension and a mass in the right femoral region, without any discoloration of the extremity. Emergency multislice computed tomography and computed tomographic angiography of the lower abdomen and the right lower extremity demonstrated two voluminous hematomas at the anterior femoral (Fig. 1A, B & Fig. 2) and internal femoral (Fig. 1C, D) surfaces with 7.8x4.6x10.5 cm and 12x8.5x9.7 cm dimensions, respectively. The anterior hematoma was ruptured and exhibited active bleeding from the right profunda femoris artery (RPFA). There was no retroperitoneal hematoma. The patient was administered normal saline solution and dobutamine intravenously for hemodynamic support and was transfered to the intensive care unit. With the diagnosis of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm confirmed and the hemodynamic deterioration of the patient worsening, ultrasound-guided thrombin injection was considered inappropriate and emergency surgery was performed. RPFA was sutured at the site of bleeding and the hematoma was evacuated. Apart from two units of red blood cell transfusion due to an 8% drop in hematocrit, the patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course. A repeat computed tomography scan of the operated region showed no pathology and the patient was discharged a few days later with instructions for reassessment and rescheduling of the initial cardiac surgery.

Fig. (1). Multislice computed tomography images demonstrating the pseudoaneurysms at the anterior (A, B) and internal (C, D) femoral regions.

Fig. (2). Visualization of the ruptured pseudoaneurysm at the anterior femoral region by computed tomographic angiography. (RCFA: Right common femoral artery; RSFA: Right superficial femoral artery; RPFA: Right profunda femoris artery).

DISCUSSION

A pseudoaneurysm is defined as a defect in the arterial wall, that allows communication of arterial blood with the adjacent extra-luminal space. In that case, blood is extravasating, however it is contained by the surrounding soft tissues and the compressed thrombus, thus forming a sac or cavity [1].

Traumatic arterial injury is the major cause of pseudoaneurysms. In these respects, the high utilization of percutaneous arterial interventions is responsible for iatrogenic arterial injury being the predominant cause of pseudoaneurysm formation [2]. The condition prolongs hospitalization, consumes health-care resources, and results in significant morbidity [3]. Furthermore, femoral pseudoaneurysms are reported to occur in 1% of diagnostic arterio-grams and up to 8% of therapeutic endovascular interventions [4].

Factors which may increase the risk of iatrogenic femoral pseudoaneurysm formation after femoral artery cannulation can be broadly categorized into procedural or patient factors. Procedural factors include low femoral puncture, inadvertent catheterization of the superficial femoral artery or profunda femoris artery, interventional rather than diagnostic procedures, and inadequate compression following removal of the arterial sheath. Patient factors include obesity, hypertension, calcified arteries, abberant anatomy with high branching common femoral artery, as well as the need for post-procedural anticoagulation [5].

Patients with femoral pseudoaneurysms typically present with pain and edema of the affected groin, along with a pulpable mass which may be pulsatile with a thrill or bruit. However, when the pseudoaneurysm involves the profunda femoris artery, or in obese patients, clinical diagnosis can be quite difficult and a high index of suspicion is required to prompt further investigation. Small pseudoaneurysms may resolve spontaneously without intervention. On the contrary, persistent pseudoaneurysms may enlarge and lead to complications related to compression of the adjacent femoral vein, nerve and overlying skin. This may cause leg edema, deep vein thrombosis, compressive neuropathy and skin necrosis.

Rupture of femoral pseudoaneurysms has been scarcely reported in the medical literature, either due to the rarity of the condition or the unwillingness to report a major iatrogenic complication. There has been a report of ruptured pseudoaneurysm after femoral arterial catheterization for continuous hemodynamic monitoring and multiple blood sampling, in a patient hospitalized in the intensive care unit [6], as well as a post-atherectomy superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm [7]. There have also been reports of ruptured femoral artery pseudoaneurysms, complicated with infection in drug addicts [8-10].

Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is the modality of choice for the diagnosis of femoral pseudoaneurysms, with a reported sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 97% [11]. On DUS, a pseudoaneurysm appears as a hypoechoic sac adjacent to the affected artery, with colour flow observed within it. The hallamark of diagnosis is the demonstration of a neck communicating between the sac and the affected artery, with a “to-and-fro” waveform. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is also a valuable diagnostic tool. CTA allows accurate assessment of the pseudoaneurysm, its surrounding structures, arterial inflow and distal run-off of the leg [4]. In recent years, gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has emerged as an alternative to CTA in the diagnosis and characterization of femoral pseudoaneurysms [12].

Approach to the management of a pseudoaneurysm depends on its anatomical location. Treatment of femoral pseudoaneurysms can be classified into the following: radiological management, including ultrasound guided compression repair (UGCR) [13], endovascular management, with the usage of embolization [14], perfusion balloons [15], and placement of covered stents/endoluminal prostheses [16]. However, when there is evidence that the femoral pseudoaneusysm is ruptured, as in our case, surgery is the cornerstone of treatment.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] Saad NE, Saad WE, Davies MG, Waldman DL, Fultz PJ, Rubens DJ. Pseudoaneurysms and the role of minimally invasive techniques in their management. Radiographics 2005; 25(Suppl. 1): S173-89.
[2] Charles PE Milne, Regent Lee, Ashok I Handa. In: Dr. Dai Yamanouchi, Ed. Iatrogenic Pseudoaneurysms, Vascular Surgery - Principles and Practice. InTech 2012. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/vascular-surgery-principles-and-practice/iatrogenic-pseudoa neurysms.
[3] Knight CG, Healy DA, Thomas RL. Femoral artery pseudoaneurysms: risk factors, prevalence, and treatment options. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17(5): 503-8.
[4] Etemad-Rezai R, Peck DJ. Ultrasound-guided thrombin injection of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms. Can Assoc Radiol J 2003; 54(2): 118-20. l
[5] Ahmad F, Turner SA, Torrie P, Gibson M. Iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysms-a review of current methods of diagnosis and treatment. Clin Radiol 2008; 63(12): 1310-6.
[6] Renner J, Pasquier P, Falzone E, Rozwadowski F, Mérat S. Life-threatening rupture of a false aneurysm after femoral catheterization : unexpected delay after a common procedure. Case Rep Vasc Med 2013; 2013: 403507.
[7] Akkus NI, Fay M, Varma J. Percutaneous treatment of delayed post-atherectomy superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm. J Invasive Cardiol 2012; 24(10): E212-4.
[8] Psathas E, Lioudaki S, Karantonis FF, Charalamboudis P, Papadopoulos O, Klonaris C. Management of a complicated ruptured infected pseudoaneu-rysm of the femoral artery in a drug addict. Case Rep Vasc Med 2012; 2012: 434768.
[9] Li Q, Shu C, Jiang X, Li M, Li X, He H. Surgical management of infected pseudoaneurysms of femoral artery caused by narcotics injection. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2009; 34(6): 476-80.
[10] Lardi C, Fracasso T. Spontaneous external rupture of femoral pseudoaneurysm: fatal hemorrhage related to drug abuse. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2012; 33(4): 319-21.
[11] Morgan R, Belli AM. Current treatment methods for postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14(6): 697-710.
[12] Glockner JF. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: applications for abdominal imaging. Radiographics 2001; 21(2): 357-70.
[13] Hajarizadeh H, LaRosa CR, Cardullo P, Rohrer MJ, Cutler BS. Ultrasound-guided compression of iatrogenic femoral pseudoaneurysm failure, recurrence, and long-term results. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22(4): 425-30.
[14] Rankin RN, McKenzie FN, Ahmad D. Embolization of arteriovenous fistulas and aneurysms with detachable balloons. Can J Surg 1983; 26(4): 317-20.
[15] Moresco K, Bonn J, DiMuzio P, Consigny PM. 1998 SCVIR Gary J. Becker Young Investigator Award. Endovascular repair of arterial pseudoaneurysms with use of a perfusion balloon catheter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9(2): 187-98.
[16] Marin ML, Veith FJ, Panetta TF, et al. Transluminally placed endovascular stented graft repair for arterial trauma. J Vasc Surg 1994; 20(3): 466-72.