Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity among Tabuk Citizens in Saudi Arabia



Jeneth Gutierrez1, Aladeen Alloubani2, *, Mohammad Mari1, Mohammad Alzaatreh3
1 Nursing Department, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
2 Nursing Research Unit, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
3 School of Nursing, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 204
Abstract HTML Views: 102
PDF Downloads: 102
ePub Downloads: 132
Total Views/Downloads: 540
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 128
Abstract HTML Views: 72
PDF Downloads: 56
ePub Downloads: 56
Total Views/Downloads: 312



© 2018 Gutierrez et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Nursing Research Unit, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan, Tel: 00962-795777178; E-mails: aa.12567@khcc.jo, aalloubani@gmail.com


Abstract

Background:

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is considered as the main cause of death worldwide. Identifying the links among CVDs risk factors can help decrease CVD-related deaths.

Aim:

To assess the prevalence of risk factors for CVD and their relationships among the Tabuk City population in Saudi Arabia.

Methods:

A cross-sectional design was used; 432 participants in the Tabuk region were included in this study.

Results:

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was 5.6%, the prevalence of hypertension (HTN) was 11.1% and obesity and overweight together were 69.9%. Mean Body Mass Index (BMI), HTN, and DM increased with age. There was a correlation between BMI with HTN (r=.200, p<.001), BMI and DM (r=.149, p<.001) and DM and HTN (r=.366, p<.001).

Conclusion:

Public awareness may help in reducing the prevalence of CVD.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Risk factors, Hypertension, Diabetes mellitus, Obesity, Body mass index.



1. INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is the major worldwide Non-Communicable Disease (NCD). There will be growing burden of CVD in developing countries after few decades [1]. This is related to the social and socioeconomic changes in developing countries. Many NCDs can be limited by preventing risk factors. Globally, the main cause of death is CVD [2-4]. According to the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation age, sex, family history, tobacco smoking, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and obesity are some significant risk factors that cause CVD [5]. Minimising the prevalence of behavioural CVD risk factors can prevent CVD [6].

During 2015, NCDs caused about 39.5 million deaths out of 56.4 million of total deaths in the world; CVD alone was responsible for 17.7 million deaths [7]. Additionally, in low and middle-income countries, approximately 30.7 million, i.e. three-quarter of deaths occurred due to NCDs [7]. CVD is responsible for global growing rates of morbidity and mortality in adults according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) [8]. Improving general physical, social, emotional and spiritual welfare should be included to upgrade a person’s health because it has a huge effect on family life. Moreover, in Saudi Arabia, CVD contributes an immense load on the health care organizations and workers [9].

In Saudi Arabia, research was carried out at King Faisal University to assess the prevalence of coronary heart disease risk factors among 159 male students [10]. Practising of physical activity was not observed by 28.9% students, on the other hand, watching TV and using a computer for hours were observed in 37.7% and 46.5% students, respectively, smoking in 19%, overweight in 24.5%, obesity in 11.9% and severe obesity in 10.7% based on Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist-hip ratio. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings of 122.8 and 71.5 mmHg, respectively, were observed in students [10]. A review study related to physical inactivity in the Saudi Arabian population discusses its implications for health, the data showed 43.3-99.5% total inactivity rate among adults and children [11].

In Bahrain, complex CVD risk factors were observed in a cross-sectional study showing 78.4% total prevalence rate of overweight and obesity; for participants who did not perform any physical activity it was 50.8%. In addition, on a daily basis, fruits and vegetables were not eaten by 24.3%, and recent smoking was observed in 16.1%. No less than 3 CVD risk factors were observed in the majority of participants (95.35%) and 3-5 risk factors were observed in 4.65% of the participants [12]. In 2007, a 36.3% prevalence of obesity and 32.9% prevalence of overweight was reported by the Bahraini National NCD Risk Factors Survey [13]. Moreover, daily intake of vegetables was recorded 62% while intake of fruits was recorded in only 49.6%. No involvement in physical activity in free time was noted in about 57.1%. Lastly, 19.9% were smokers [13].

In the United Arab Emirates, cross-sectional community-based research was conducted to identify established CVD risk factors by means of the Framingham risk score for risk assessment [14]. According to this research, 28.4% of the participants had a score >20%, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) was observed in 23.3%, hypertension (HTN) in 20.8%, obesity in 37.3%, metabolic syndrome in 22.7% and smoking habit was observed in 19.6% of the male participants; 2.4% of the participants were found to have coronary heart disease, and 64% males and 53% females had an abnormal lipid profile mainly because of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) or triglycerides levels [14].

In Iran, cross-sectional research [15] was carried out regarding CVD risk factors; 36.6% males and 35.9% females were overweight. Obesity was observed in 11.2% males and 28.1% females. Increase in the mean BMI, waist circumference, and the waist-hip ratio was observed up to the age of 65 years. As risk factors, males and females had increased serum cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose level (2 h after drinking a glucose solution), waist circumference and BMI [15].

It is clear from a long-term follow-up research that after 65 years of age a prolonged, healthier life and decreased medical care expenses are related to a favourable risk factor profile during the working years [16]. A considerable decline in the major adverse cardiovascular events was also observed due to the treatment of each of the major cardiovascular risk factors [16].

2. AIMS

To assess the prevalence of risk factors for CVD among the Tabuk City population in Saudi Arabia. We also assessed the correlation among the risk factors of coronary artery disease including BMI, HTN and DM to establish baseline data for upcoming programs.

3. METHODOLOGY

3.1. Setting and Sample

A non-experimental, cross-sectional design was used. This research was conducted in Tabuk City in Saudi Arabia. Tabuk is one of the 13 major regions in Saudi Arabia located in the north western area of the Kingdom with a total population of around 571,000 [17].

Data were collected at the big major malls to ensure the representation of the population. A sample of 432 participants was collected. The sample size was estimated by using the Slovin’s formula based on a power of .80, level of significant .05, population size (n) 571,000 and a medium effect size. The required sample size based on that was at least 400 participants. In the study, 432 participants were included to overcome any attrition during data collection process [18]. Inclusion criteria were all people who live in Tabuk City and with an age ≥18 years old.

3.2. Methods

A self-administered structured questionnaire was used in this study. Validity and reliability were tested in a previous study based on a sample size of 120. The questionnaire was made from multiple-choice questions that needed about 10 min to finish. The questionnaire included demographic variables like age, gender, nationality, marital status, educational level, occupation and income. Anthropometric measures including blood pressure, Random Blood Sugar (RBS), height, weight and BMI, were also recorded.

Data were collected by the authors and trained nursing and medical students in their internship in October 2016. The participants were voluntarily involved in this study after explaining the objectives, significance, confidential use of data, and utilization of the outcomes. The respondents were advised about their right to either agree to participate, withdraw, or decline without any risk or benefits.

Anthropometric measurements were obtained by trained nursing and medical students in their internship. The participants were asked to take 10 min rest, and then, blood pressure was measured 2 times in sitting position at an interval of 10 min using mercury sphygmomanometers. The mean of these 2 readings was considered for analysis. Blood pressure readings were categorized according to American Heart Association (AHA) into 4 groups: in which 1-4 scores were assigned, score 1 means that the participant has normal blood pressure range (systolic reading <120 and/or diastolic <80), a score of 2 represents prehypertension (systolic reading and/or 120-139, diastolic 80-89), while a score 3 demonstrates high blood pressure stage 1 (systolic reading 140-159 and/or diastolic 90-99), and finally score 4 represents stage 2 (systolic reading >160 and/or diastolic <100) [19]. Weight scales with stadiometers were used to measure weight and height, and BMI was calculated based on the formula BMI were classified into 4 categories: <18.5 means underweight, 18.5 to <25 means normal weight, 25 to <30 is overweight and >30 is considered obese [20]. RBS was measured by a glucometer (Accu-Chek® Active Blood Glucose Meter) and the reading was subdivided into 2 groups; normal (<200 mg/dl); and hyperglycaemia (≥200 mg/dl) [21]. During their interview, the participants were provided with their blood pressure, RBS, height, weight, and BMI results.

3.3. Ethical Consideration

This study was intended to protect human rights. The details of the study were fully disclosed in the informed consent. The researchers were available at the time of consent and throughout the study to answer questions from the participants. Strategies were utilized to protect the participant data. At any time during the study, the participants were allowed to voluntarily quit the study. The ethical approval was obtained from the University of Tabuk Ethical Committee before the beginning of data collection. All information collected during this study was kept confidential. Each participant was assigned a study serial number to ensure the confidentiality and privacy.

3.4. Data Analysis

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 23) was used to analyse the results. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse demographic data, whereas inferential statistics (t-test and Spearman’s rho) were utilized to assess the relationships between demographics and the dependent variables. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (Pearson’s correlation, for short) was used to measure the strength and direction of relationship between BMI, HTN and DM.

4. RESULTS

4.1. Demographic Characteristics

The total number of participants was 432; males 235 (54.4%) and females 197 (45.6%). Most of the participants were 18-30 years old. This group involved 208 participants (48.1%) of the sample. The second group was those with age ranging from 31-50 years including 129 participants (29.9%) of the total sample. The last group was those above 50 years old. This group had 95 participants (22% of the total sample).

The education level was categorized into 4 levels: primary, secondary, bachelor degree and higher education. The bachelor's group was predominant with a total number of 170 individuals (39.3%) in the overall sample. The secondary education level group had a total number of 162 participants (37.5%). Information relating to marital status was categorized into single, married, divorced or widowed. The single group had 158 participants (36.6%), the married group had 267 (61.8%) participants, and the divorced and widow groups were only 3 (0.7%) and 4 (0.9%), respectively.

Other demographic elements considered were nationality and income status; 386 (89.4%) of the participants were Saudi and 46 (10.6%) were Non-Saudi. The income section revealed that the participants whose earning was <5000 Saudi Riyal (SR) were 167 (38.7%). Also, those who had an income between 5000-10000 SR were 163 (37.7%). Finally, those individuals whose income was >10000 SR were 102 (23.6%). Detailed demographic data of the study sample is displayed in Table 1.

4.2. Prevalence of Obesity, HTN, DM

If the participant had a BMI between 25 and 30 Kg/m2, he/she was considered overweight, and if the BMI was >30 he/she was considered obese. Total number of overweight and obese participants was 302 (69.9%), which indicates a high percentage of obesity in the sample, Nonetheless, the mean BMI was 28.3 Kg/m2. Hypertensive participants were 48 (11.1%), however, pre-hypertensive participants (systolic pressure 120-139 and/or diastolic 80-89 mmHg) were 80 (18.5%). RBS was used as a DM criterion, patients with hyperglycaemia (RBS ≥ 200 mg/dl) were 24 (5.6%). RBS ranged from 72 to 417 mg/dl; the mean was 117 mg/dl (standard deviation 48).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the sample.
Variable N %
Gender
Male 235 54.4
Female 197 45.6
Age (years)
(18-30) 208 48.1
(31-50) 129 29.9
(> 50) 95 22
Level of education
Primary 92 21.3
Secondary 162 37.5
Bachelor degree 170 39.35
Higher education 8 1.85
Marital Status
Single 158 36.6
Married 267 61.8
Divorced 3 .7
Widow 4 .9
Nationality
Saudi 386 89.4
Non-Saudi 46 10.6
Income (Saudi Riyals)
< 5000 167 38.7
5000-1000 163 37.7
> 1000 102 23.6

4.3. BMI, HTN and DM Differences by Gender

Independent sample t-test was used to assess the differences between males and females in terms of BMI and the presence of DM. RBS level was significantly different between males and females; males 122 mg/dl and females 111 mg/dl (p =.015). Other details are displayed in Table 2. Furthermore, data related to HTN were analysed by Chi-square. More men had a higher blood pressure than women (p <.001). Other details are presented in Table 3.

Table 2. Gender, Body Mass Index and Diabetes Mellitus.
Gender Male
Mean (SD)
Female
Mean (SD)
p (t-test)
BMI 27.9 (5.8) 28.7 (6.7) .67 (1.3)
RBS 122 (54) 111 (38) .015 (2.4)
BMI: Body Mass Index, RBS: Random Blood Sugar
Table 3. Chi-square per gender with hypertension.
Gender Normal Blood Pressure
n=304 (%)
Prehypertension
n=80 (%)
Hypertension Stage 1
n=41 (%)
Hypertension Stage 2
n=7 (%)
p (χ2 test)
Male 136 (44.7) 58 (72.5) 34 (82.9) 7 (100) <.001 (41.3)
Female 168 (55.3) 22 (27.5) 7 (17.1) 0 (0)

4.4. BMI and DM Differences Per Age

ANOVA analysis was conducted to evaluate the differences in BMI and RBS variables relating to age groups (Fig. 1). Overall, there were significant differences among age groups in the 2 variables. There was a slight increase in the mean of BMI as age progressed. For example, participants of age above 50 years had the highest level of BMI (mean 30.8 ± 5.0) while the groups of 31-50 years and 18-30 years had BMI means 30.3 ± 6.5 and 25.9 ± 5.6, respectively at p <.001. In addition, the RBS increased significantly at p-value < .001 for all the 3 age groups.

Fig. (1). ANOVA per age with Body Mass Index & Random Blood Sugar.

4.5. HTN Differences Per Age

The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient analysis was conducted to assess the strength and direction of the relationship between HTN and age groups. There was a positive significant relationship between age and HTN (rs= .289**, p= < .001). Generally, as age advanced there was an increase in blood pressure. Detailed data are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Spearman’s rho per age with Hypertension.
Age Normal Blood Pressure
n=304 (%)
Prehypertension
n=80 (%)
Hypertension Stage 1
n=41 (%)
Hypertension Stage 2
n=7 (%)
rs p
(18-30) 170 (55.9) 31 (38.75) 7 (17.1) 0 (0) .289** <.001
(31-50) 85 (28) 28 (35) 16 (39) 0 (0)
>50 49 (16.1) 21 (26.25) 18 (43.9) 7 (100)

4.6. Correlation Among the BMI, HTN and DM

This section shows a summary of the relation among BMI, HTN and DM. Table 5. displays the correlation among these 3 variables by a Pearson product-moment correlation. A positive correlation was detected among BMI with HTN and DM (r = .200** and .149**, respectively at p<.001), whereas the relationship between HTN and DM was (r = .366**, p<.001). Indeed, this relationship was the strongest correlation observed among these 3 variables.

Table 5. Correlation among Body Mass Index, Hypertension & Diabetes Mellitus.
BMI HTN DM
BMI r 1 .200** .149**
p value <.001 < .001
HTN r .200** 1 .366**
p value < .001 < .001
DM r .149** .366** 1
p value < .001 < .001
BMI: Body Mass Index, HTN: Hypertension, DM: Diabetes Mellitus
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

5. DISCUSSION

According to Kontis et al. [22], there has been a high prevalence of cases of cardiovascular health problems worldwide. These cases are attributed to risk factors such as HTN, obesity and overweight, BMI of >25, physical inactivity and lack of adequate fruit consumption [23, 24]. Lifestyle and some administrative jobs have been shown to be potential risk factors for obesity and overweight especially [25].

The results obtained show an alarming rate of some risk factors. According to this study, there is an increase in the cases of DM, HTN and BMI as age increases. This is probably because as individuals age, they tend to participate less in physical activities which are essential to reduce sugar levels [26]. Moreover, the economic transition in Saudi Arabia has prompted potential influences on individual’s lifestyle. For example, it has contributed to occupational patterns that are detrimental to most of the physical activities [27].

This study reported that HTN affects 11.1% of the participants, which is consistent with a previous study in Saudi Arabia [28]. This reveals that the global HTN burden is widespread and growing, signifying the necessity for intervention to prevent this disease. Furthermore, the findings recognized a significant association between HTN and age in males and females, which is in line with national and worldwide studies on various populations with diverse geographical, environmental, social and financial attributes [29, 30].

Internationally, the prevalence rate of DM is expected to increase by up to 42% from 2003 to 2025 [31]. The prevalence in the Gulf area is highest in Bahrain (25.7%) and Oman (16.1%) [32, 33]. This study showed an additional growth in the prevalence of DM in previous studies conducted in Saudi Arabia. This study displayed an increase in the blood sugar level as age increases. Studies carried out in Saudi Arabia showed diverse age-specific prevalence rates. Certainly, the association between DM and age is consistent with previous studies [34, 35]. The recent reports of the International Diabetes Federation about the prevalence of DM showed comparable outcomes [36]. The results of this study indicate that participants of age above 50 years had considerable problems in glucose level, which coincides with World Health Organization’s report; 51% of aged people suffer from abnormal glucose level [2, 37].

Globally, the prevalence of DM is comparable in both genders [38, 39], but it is slightly higher in females than in males at age <60 years [40], but in the present study, men had a higher RBS than women. Al-Nozha et al. [34] in 2004, documented a 20% prevalence of DM in the Saudi Arabia population in both genders. Another study [41] in 1987, stated that the rate of DM is similar in both genders in a rural area in Saudi Arabia; both studies were inconsistent with the present study. One reason may be a change in patterns over the years.

DM is reported to increase as age increases [42, 43]. The prevalence of DM was greater in males compared with females (p =.015). This clearly provides a strong rationale for the increasing prevalence of cardiovascular health problems in Saudi Arabia.

The findings of this study showed that men who took part in this study had a lower rate of obesity compared with women. This finding was inconsistent with the result of studies by Ferdinandy et al. [44] in 2014 and Jarrah et al. [45] in 2011, which showed that the mean BMI of women was significantly lower than that of men. The finding of this study may reflect a rationale that women tend to be more inactive than men.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Several risk factors were identified to contribute in CVD in Saudi Arabia. The findings of this study pointed out that as the magnitude of the BMI increases, the positive association with the risk factors also increases. Another important consideration is weight management, a fundamental step in countering cardiovascular health problems. Some of the weight loss activities that were found to be useful include: dietary pattern management and physical activities among others. One of the major identified recommendations is the creation of public awareness through campaigns to aid in reducing the prevalence of CVD. The study recommends that a larger study covering all the aspects of risk factors associated with CVD should be conducted. Besides, the government should encourage country-wide awareness of the risk factors through campaigns and increase the service quality provided in hospitals to boost better understanding and management of overweight, DM and HTN to prevent CVD.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at University of Tabuk.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this review.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

A consent form was signed by all of the participants enrolled in the study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge financial support for this work, from the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia (grant S-1437-0208).

REFERENCES

[1] Boutayeb A, Boutayeb S. The burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries. Int J Equity Health 2005; 4(1): 2.
[2] World Health Organization. Global status report on non communicable diseases. World Health Organization 2014 http://whoint/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ http://who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ Accessed October 8, 2016
[3] Alloubani A, Abdelhafiz IM. Prevalence of risk factors of cardiovascular diseases among university of Tabuk employees and students. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 2016; 7(7): 9880. [http://dx.doi: 10.4172/2155-9880.C1.045].
[4] Alloubani A, Abdelhafiz IM, Saleh AA. Relative and global health: A comparative study between healthcare systems of Jordan and France. World Health Popul 2016; 16(4): 9-19.
[5] Buttar HS, Li T, Ravi N. Prevention of cardiovascular diseases: Role of exercise, dietary interventions, obesity and smoking cessation. Exp Clin Cardiol 2005; 10(4): 229-49.
[6] World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) 2016.
[7] World Health Organization. NCD mortality and morbidity Global Health Observatory 2015.
[8] World Health Organization. Burden: Mortality, morbidity and risk factors. Global Status Report on Non Communicable Diseases Vol Ch.1.; 2010.
[9] Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction.Flow and the foundations of positive psychology 2014; 279-98. [http://dx.doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18.]
[10] Sabra AA, Taha AZ, Al-Sebiany AM, Al-Kurashi NY, Al-Zubier AG, Al-Zubier AG. Coronary heart disease risk factors: Prevalence and behavior among male university students in Dammam City, Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2007; 82(1-2): 21-42.
[11] Al-Hazzaa HM. Prevalence of physical inactivity in Saudi Arabia: A brief review. East Mediterr Health J 2004; 10(4-5): 663-70.
[12] Abdulabbas Abdulla Alajmi A, Wood D The prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among employees in the kingdom of Bahrain between October 2010 and March 2011: A cross-sectional study from a workplace health campaign 2014; 832421. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/832421] [PMID: 25105054]
[13] Alsayyad J, Omran A, Amin FA, Hamadeh RR. National non-communicable diseases risk factors survey 2007 2010.
[14] Baynouna LM, Revel AD, Nagelkerke NJ, et al. High prevalence of the cardiovascular risk factors in Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates. An emerging health care priority. Saudi Med J 2008; 29(8): 1173-8.
[15] Kelishadi R, Gharipour M, Sadri GH, Tavasoli AA, Amani A. Cardiovascular disease risk factors, metabolic syndrome and obesity in an Iranian population. East Mediterr Health J 2008; 14(5): 1070-9.
[16] Al-Shehri AM. Prevalence and pattern of lipid disorders in Saudi patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. J Family Community Med 2014; 21(3): 166-9.
[17] Labour Force Survey. Saudi Arabia: population aged 15 and above by nationality (Saudi/non-Saudi), activity status and administrative region (governorate) of residence Saudi Arabia; 2014 http://gulfmigration.eu/saudi-arabia-population-aged-15-and-above-by-nationality- saudinon-saudi-activity- status-and-administrative-region-governorate-of-residence-jan-2014/?print=pdf
[18] Tejada J, Punzalan J. On the misuse of Slovin’s formula. Philipp Stat 2012; 61(1): 129-36.http://www.psai.ph/sites/default/files/On the Misuse of Slovin’s Formula.pdf
[19] American Heart Association (AHA). The facts about high blood pressure http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/HighBloodPressure/ GettheFactsAboutHighBloodPressure/ The-Facts-About-High-Blood-Pressure_UCM_002050_Article.jsp#.WS_yA5KGMdV2017.
[20] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Defining adult overweight and obesity https://wwwcdcgov/obesity/adult/defininghtml https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html Published 2017. Accessed June 1, 2017.
[21] American Diabetes Association. Diagnosing diabetes and learning about prediabetes: American Diabetes Association® http://www.diabetes.org/are-you-at-risk/prediabetes/?loc=superfooter Published 2017
[22] Kontis V, Mathers CD, Rehm J, et al. Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25×25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: A modelling study. Lancet 2014; 384(9941): 427-37.
[23] Chomistek AK, Chiuve SE, Eliassen AH, Mukamal KJ, Willett WC, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle in the primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease among young women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65(1): 43-51. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.024].
[24] https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZLMXDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=World+Health+Organization.+(2013).+Global+and+regional+estimates+of+violence+against+women: +prevalence+and+health+effects+of+intimate+partner+violence+and+ non-partner+sexual+violenc World Health Organization. García-Moreno C, Pallitto C, Devries K, Stöckl H, Watts C, Abrahams N. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.; 2013.
[25] Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS. ACSM’s new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep 2013; 12(4): 215-7.http://journals.lww.com/acsm-csmr/fulltext/ 2013/07000/ACSM_s_New_Preparticipation_Health_Screening.4.aspx
[26] Singh GM, Danaei G, Farzadfar F, et al. The age-specific quantitative effects of metabolic risk factors on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: A pooled analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8(7): e65174.
[27] El Bcheraoui C, Basulaiman M, Tuffaha M, et al. Status of the diabetes epidemic in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. Int J Public Health 2014; 59(6): 1011-21.
[28] Al-Nozha MM, Abdullah M, Arafah MR, et al. Hypertension in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2007; 28(1): 77-84. http://repository.ksu.edu.sa/jspui/bitstream/ 123456789/3007/1/ Hypertension in Saudi Arabia.pdf
[29] Singh RB, Fedacko J, Pella D, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for prehypertension and hypertension in five Indian cities. Acta Cardiol 2011; 66(1): 29-37.
[30] Erem C, Hacihasanoglu A, Kocak M, Deger O, Topbas M. Prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension and associated risk factors among Turkish adults: Trabzon Hypertension Study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2009; 31(1): 47-58.
[31] Gan D. Diabetes Atlas 2003.
[32] Al-Lawati JA, Al Riyami AM, Mohammed AJ, Jousilahti P. Increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Oman. Diabet Med 2002; 19(11): 954-7.
[33] Hannadeh R. Noncommunicable diseases among the Bahraini population: A review. East Mediterr Heal J 2000; 6(5/6): 1091.http://www.academia.edu/download/41740890/Non_communicable_diseases_among_the_Bahr20160129-29023-gol5kb.pdf
[34] Al-Nozha MM, Al-Maatouq MA, Al-Mazrou YY, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2004; 25(11): 1603-10.https://repository.nu.edu.sa/handle/123456789/2272
[35] Rathmann W, Giani G. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(10): 2568-9.http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/27/10/2568.short
[36] Fox CS, Golden SH, Anderson C, et al. Update on prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in light of recent evidence. Circulation 2015; 132(8): 691-718.http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/132/8/691.short
[37] Ibrahim N, Mahnashi M. Risk factors of coronary heart disease among medical students in King Abdulaziz University. BMC Public Health 2014; 14(1): 411-718.https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/ articles/10.1186/1471-2458-14-411
[38] Silverman A, Huang CC, Russell M, et al. Stop atherosclerosis in native diabetics study (SANDS): Baseline characteristics of the randomized cohort. J Health Dispar Res Pract 2009; 3(1): 3.
[39] Alloubani A, Saleh A, Abdelhafiz I. Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus as a Predictive Risk Factors for Stroke. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2018. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2018.03.009].
[40] Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Pacini G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev 2016; 37(3): 278-316.
[41] Fatani HH, Mira SA, el-Zubier AG. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in rural Saudi Arabia. Diabetes Care 1987; 10(2): 180-3.http://care.diabetesjournals.org/ content/10/2/180.short
[42] Wang Q, Ma A, Han X, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes among newly detected pulmonary tuberculosis patients in China: A community based cohort study. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e82660.
[43] Olokoba AB, Obateru OA, Olokoba LB. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review of current trends. Oman Med J 2012; 27(4): 269-73.
[44] Ferdinandy P, Hausenloy DJ, Heusch G, Baxter GF, Schulz R. Interaction of risk factors, comorbidities, and comedications with ischemia/reperfusion injury and cardioprotection by preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning. Pharmacol Rev 2014; 66(4): 1142-74.http://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/ content/66/4/1142.short
[45] Jarrah S, Yasein N, Petro W, Nassar S. Early detection of cardiovascular diseases risk factors among jordan university students. Al-Magallat al-Tibbiyyat al-Urdunniyyat 2011; 45(1): 51-61.http://journals.ju.edu.jo/JMJ/article/view/2398